The Prospectors Page . . . .
The Prospectors Page
We are currently looking for unpublished 1-2 page stories, preferably with photos, to boost our website content. The they must be true, and should deal with some aspect of mining, mining life, or mining culture. They do not need to be success stories, as failure is the best teacher. Humor is allowed, although it should be in good taste. We will pay $75 for any article that is printed.
A friend at work recently showed me a must see video. The video is an old black and white silent film from 1927 that details mining from prospecting through production, with film shot at mine sights from Alaska to Arizona (with a stop in Utah). It details mining processes to include open pit mining and detailed descriptions of underground mining techniques. Interesting photos of historical mining towns are included. Check out the film here:
The Story of Copper Mining
Sorry, the link is not working–you will need to copy and past the address. I will get it fixed as soon as I am able.
About Dry-washing and Crescent Creek
Here, I am dry washing for gold on Crescent Creek, just below the Henry Mountains in southern Utah.
I recently met with Donnie Morris of Confetti Books and Antiques in Spanish Fork, Utah to do an interview for his television show Turning the Page–where we talk about the book A Guide to Gold Panning in Utah. Here is Part 1.
Here is Part 2 of the Turning the Page interview on Gold Panning in Utah.
Exploring a New Prospecting Area: The Drum Mountains©
by Alan Chenworth
This article was Originally Printed in the Gold Prospector Magazine in the spring (June?) of 2012.
Living in Utah (where placer gold is a little scarce), I am always on the lookout for a new place to pan for gold. As I have done this over the years, I have developed something of a method that I follow to determine which areas warrant my time and further exploration. And having just returned from a prospecting trip to a new area, I thought that I would take a few minutes and write down the recommended steps for exploring one, using this trip as an example.
Exploring a new area starts with the rumors. A friend once told me that he had found placer gold in the Drum Mountains in central Utah. The Drum Mountains are north of Delta, west of the IPP Power Plant, and just to the south of Topaz Mountain. They are a low lying range of mountains –very dry, and having no known springs—in the middle of Utah’s West Desert. Vegetation is sparse; mostly grass and sage, but there are some juniper trees in the canyons and at higher elevations.
I have been to the Drums before, visiting a group of manganese mines on the north end of the range (including the Black Boy Mine), but I found no gold. As I remembered my friend’s story, it occurred to me that he said he’d found his gold on the south side of the range. I had not explored the south side of the range, and knew little of the history and geology.
The step was to pull out a map of the Drum Mountains. I use topographical maps, and in fact purchased a complete set of topographical maps for the state of Utah. As I began looking over the maps, it became apparent that there is a lot more to this range than I had believed. The 1:24,000 topo maps often show a lot of detail, including mines, prospects, adits, shafts and cabins. The range—from north to south—was completely riddled with old mines. In fact, some of the largest mines were on the south end of the range. The topo map even showed where the tailings were left from past mining operations. It became apparent that there was a lot I didn’t know about the area, and it was time to hit the books.
The third thing that I did was to look for the history of the district. For just such an occasion, I have a book entitled The Ore Deposits of Utah, written by a collection of Geologists (Butler, et al) in about 1919. Here is what I found. The mines of the area were organized as the Drum Mining District in 1872. After the mines failed, it was re-organized as the Detroit Mining District in 1879. The principal mines of the area were the E.P.H, Charm, Ibex and Copperhead claims. I was not able to determine the total value of metals recovered from this district, but at one point (probably in the 1890’s), the 130,000 pounds of copper bullion that this district produced made it the largest producer of copper in the state. That is significant in a state that home the Bingham Canyon Copper Mine. A chart found in the book showed that between 1904 and 1917 there was $45,808 dollars worth of gold, silver and copper produced in the district. This does not include any lead or zinc produced by the district. It also does not count the manganese, as it was produced later (and in a different part of the range); or a larger gold mine on the south end of the range that was worked at a relatively recent date.
Finding out that there has been gold and other precious metals produced here in a commercial quantity peaked my interest, and I started looking at the geology of the range. It seems that most of the range is in limestone. That is not a good sign for gold placers, but read on. V.C. Heikes (one of the writers in Ore Deposits of Utah) reported there have been some small monzonite dikes that have intruded the limestone country rock. (Monzonite is similar to granite, except with little or no quartz in the rock). While there was some mineralization near these dikes, the dikes were not near the productive mines of the area. Instead, the mineralized zones were located in replacement fissures—places where the fluid flow in faults and fissures had replaced the limestone with silica and various ore minerals. These areas were referred to as “reefs” because these narrow, silicified veins were much harder than the surrounding limestone. These reefs reportedly contained pyrite, or if oxidized, limonite; as well as chalcopyrite and its oxides, such as azurite, malachite. . . . Some galena and bismuth have also been found in the area. The ore was principally copper ore, but averaged over 5 oz silver and about 1/3rd ounce gold to the ton—some of the mines even reported gold values in the range of ½ to ¾ ounces per ton.
An open shaft near the Crows Nest cabin, to the north of the Drum Mine.
5. Field Visit
Now that I knew that there was abundant mining in the area—and that the area mines were relatively rich with precious metals (including gold), it became clear that a field visit was in order. I picked a weekend at the end of March to visit the area. It was late enough in the year that snow would not likely be a problem, but early enough that it isn’t too hot. The weather forecast was advertising rain and snow for the day, but we decided to chance it.
It took about two hours to get there from Salt Lake City, but the roads were good and the weather was holding off. We started at the south end of the range, in the canyon above one of the bigger mines in the area. As we drove up the canyon, I noticed shale beds off to the west of the road, while everything else around us was dark limestone. Those of you who know gold will understand that limestone and shale do not usually make for a good placer deposit. However, knowing that trilobites are found in the similar looking shale in the House range to the west, I thought it would be fun to look for trilobites. It took about 30 seconds before I found one, and had another in a few seconds more. A little bit more looking left me with a piece of shale that was loaded with pieces of broken trilobites. This is not what I came for so we didn’t stay long, but it was fun and interesting. I will keep it in mind for future reference. As we followed the canyon up, it broadened out and split into two canyons. We kept to the right on the main road, and found ourselves at an old mine, complete with two cabins and an outhouse. One cabin had fallen down, but the other was still standing, and seemed to be kept in decent shape for overnight visitors (some of which may bring a keg or two).
The mine itself consisted of a deep shaft (60-80’ in depth) alongside a larger open cut. Several drifts also took off from the inside of the open cut to unknown destinations. I wasn’t about to follow them. In the mining area, I found a large shear zone, complete with silicified breccias (angular broken rocks in a fault) and large amounts of iron oxide—probably limonite. Several rocks found on the dump showed traces of copper staining, but no visible ore was seen. Several small, old ceramic crucibles were seen next to the fallen down cabin, which indicates that it may have been used an assay office. We had been there about thirty minutes when it started to snow and we headed down the canyon.
By the time we got to the bottom of the canyon, it had stopped snowing, so we came around the west side of the mountain to the north and headed up the next canyon. A couple of miles up, we found a tunnel and a set of shafts that were following another reef. Again, the reef was in limestone, but the rock was faulted and broken. The fault zone was about 4 feet wide with a 1-2 ft oxidized layer running down the middle of it—and replaced with silica and red iron oxide (limonite). There was no other visible mineralization. Whatever had been in the reef was completely mined out. We also did not go down into the shafts because they were very deep and unsafe. As we left, one of our group wanted to walk down and out of the canyon. When we picked him up, he showed us a piece of float that he had picked up at the base of the canyon near the main road. This rock had a small ball of blue azurite on one end, and small flecks of green (malachite?) below it. There is (or was) copper ore in the area.
As we continued north, we came to the next canyon, the largest and most prominent of the canyons on the west side. As we started up the canyon, the base was very narrow, but soon opened up into a broad canyon. Small mines and prospects were seen throughout the area, with their bright red, limonite stained dumps standing out. We followed the road to the top of the canyon, where just below the peak, we found several more mines. These were the largest of the old mines in the area. There were large, deep shafts and adits following the quartz reefs. Iron staining and limonite was abundant, but there were few other minerals visible, and we saw no sulfide ore on the dumps. It is a very interesting place, but the snow started up again while we were on the peak, and we were forced to head back down. We got out and back to the highway just before the storm got bad—and rain in the lower elevations made the road impassible.
Mining in the range has been extensive, but without drilling or going down into the shafts and adits, it could be difficult to find any significant mineralization. We did take small gravel samples from the bottoms of the main drainages to see if there was any placer gold. Surprisingly, there was some fine black sand—I didn’t expect to see black sand with all the limestone in the area. There wasn’t a lot, but there was some—and a little gold. I found one small piece of very shiny gold, and 4 or 5 much smaller specs. I was actually using a hand lens to examine the black sand for gold. I cannot yet quantify the gold as these were very small samples, and the gold was even smaller. It does appear that there is free milling gold in the Drums, but it is very small in size and probably quite spread out. Low grade placers are a possibility.
The Drum Mountains are covered with active load claims, and much of the canyon bottoms are covered in placer claims. This made it very difficult to find places to sample. From what I have seen, the placer claims probably aren’t there because of the profitable placers in the area. Instead, they’re being filed “just in case” something turns up or to prevent someone else from filing on them—probably something of a safety net. The load claims, however, could someday be of value when someone decides to drill and finds another high grade vein, or possibly a deeply buried porphyry deposit.
The last, and possibly the most important thing to do is take the time to review your trip. It would be best to do this before you leave the prospecting site, but make sure you review the trip somewhere along the way. I left in a snow storm, so I waited until I was home to review the trip. I pulled out the maps and methodically went over all the mines and drainages that I visited. What I found out was that a narrow, unimportant dirt road that I passed by was actually the access road to the largest canyon on the south side of the range—and incidentally, the access to the Ibex Mine, which was also the largest producer. It seems that bad weather, a lack of time, and a lack of attention to the map details means that I will need to take another trip out there to examine the best chance for a placer deposit in the range. Had I slowed down, and checked the map closer, I would have visited the drainage below the Ibex mine first. I saw the road, but it looked insignificant—I didn’t think the road went anywhere. Big mistake. Now that I have reviewed the trip and identified a problem, I know where to check on my next trip to the Drums.
This is just a simple example of the method that I use to explore new prospecting areas. The steps to this method are cheap and effective. They don’t take much of time, and it gives me something to do in the winter while I wait for the snow to melt. It also allows me to prioritize all of the prospects that are vying for my attention and time in the field. IF an area checks out with all of the above steps, I move to Step 8—Filing a claim; but this will have to wait to another day as it is a separate, multi-step process am not ready to do in the Drums, and that I don’t have time to cover in this article.
Butler B.S., Loughlin, G.F., Hiekes, V.C., and Others, 1920, The Ore Deposits of Utah, USGS Prof. Paper 111, Detroit District, p. 463-465.
Definitions of Mining Claims©
By Alan Chenworth
Under the Mining Laws of 1872, there are four types of mining claims that are recognized by the BLM. These include (1) Placer Claims (2) Load Claims (3) Tunnel Site Claims, and (4) Mill Sites. As I often get questions about mining claims and how to file them, I will review these claim types and how to file them.
Minerals which can be filed on generally include all metallic mineral deposits such as (but not limited to) gold, silver, copper, lead, uranium, and iron. The list of things that can be filed on also includes non-metallic minerals such as gemstones, bentonite (clay), and non-standard rock such as gypsum, chemical grade silica, pumice and cinders may also be filed on.[i]
Rock products such as gravel, boulders, and quarried stone are not locatable minerals. Neither are fossils—and caves cannot be located under a mining claim. These types of things are generally dealt with under a lease agreement with the BLM.
Mining claims are considered real property, and can be bought, sold, written into wills, and can be used as collateral on a loan.
Here (below) are the definitions of the claim types. Definitions have been taken directly from BLM websites.
Placer Claim Definition
Courtesy of the BLM[ii]
Placer – All deposits, other than lodes. These include placer deposits of sand and gravel containing free gold and other minerals. Placer claims are located by legal subdivision. An individual may locate up to 20 acres with a maximum of 160 contiguous acres with 8 or more people (an association). A corporation is consider[ed] a single locator. (43 CFR 3842)
A Placer Claim is meant to be used for placer deposits. A placer is a mineral that has been weathered from its host rock, and often eroded to another area where it forms an economical deposit. Therefore, a placer gold deposit is a deposit of gold that has been moved from its original location. Generally, placer deposits are in canyons, and along creeks. Often in desert areas, these deposits are found in alluvial fans. Placer claims include anything from the bedrock to the land surface.
A standard placer claim is 20 acres (or less), but may be filed as an Association Claim, meaning that multiple claims may be filed as one (up to eight) for a total claim size of up to 160 acres; provided that there is one claim locator for every 20 acres of claim. The claim may be filed in just about any shape, though square or rectangle is most common. An association claim is designed to benefit small miners, as a small group of miners may claim more land and pay less fees. **As of the writing of this article (August 2012), the BLM has begun to charge a separate assessment fee for every 20 acres of an Association Claim, though the small miners exemption will still be in effect. The fees were approved by Congress in the Dept. of the Interiors 2012 annual budget.
Laws governing mining claims often vary from state to state, but in Utah, a load claim can be filed over a placer, but only if the owner of the placer gives permission for the load claim to be filed. If they do not have permission, the claim is invalid and the locator of the load claim has committed mineral trespass. If the owner of a placer claim wishes to work the load under his claim, he must file a load claim before work can begin.
Lode Claim Definition
(Courtesy of the BLM)
Lode – A classic vein, ledge, or other rock in place between definite walls. A lode claim is located by metes and bounds. The maximum length is 1,500 feet by 600 feet. (43 CFR 3841)
A lode claim is meant to claim any locatable mineral that is in its original place of deposition and still hosted within the original host rock. Veins, porphyry deposits and Carlin style gold deposits are good examples of this. Most uranium deposits are also filed under this type of claim.
Generally, these claims start at the surface of the bedrock and go down. There is no lower limit to these claims. These claims are approximately 20 acres, and are a standard 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide. Generally, the long direction of the claim runs along the strike of the vein, with the point of discovery in the center at one end (300 feet on either side of it).
In Utah, a lode claim takes supremacy over a placer, meaning that a placer cannot be filed over a load, unless it is by the owner of the load claim. The owner of a load claim cannot work the placer without filing on the placer. In Nevada, you cannot legally file a placer over a lode—not even the owner of the lode claim. Laws governing lodes and placers vary from state to state—check with the BLM for your particular area of interest.
Definition of a Tunnel Site Claim
(Courtesy of the BLM)
Tunnel Site – A tunnel site is where a tunnel is run to develop a vein or lode. It may also be used for the discovery of unknown veins or lodes. To stake a tunnel site, two stakes are placed up to 3,000 feet apart on the line of the proposed tunnel. Recordation is the same as a lode claim. A Tunnel Site can be regarded more as a right-a-way, than a mining claim. (43 CFR 3843)
A Tunnel Site is different from a load claim in that it can be twice as long, and is used as a right of way. To the best of my understanding, if a load is discovered while driving a tunnel, a load claim should also be filed.
Definition of a Mill Site Claim
(Courtesy of the BLM)
Mill Site – Public lands which are non-mineral in character. Mill Sites may be located in connection with a placer or lode claim for mining and milling purposes or as an independent/custom mill site that is independent of a mining claim. Mill Sites are located by metes and bounds or legal subdivision and are up to 5 acres in size. (43 CFR 3844)
Mill Sites are non-mineral claims that are used specifically for mining and milling, and are no more than 5 acres in size. These areas are generally located near the mining areas, but in places where no mineral is likely to be found.
Filing a Claim
While most people often think of claim staking as difficult or complex—it is actually quite simple, provided you follow the correct steps.
The first thing to do is find a place that you are interested in. It should be somewhere that there is a deposit that can be mined at a profit. The mining laws state that the claim should be something that the prudent man could work at a profit, given the highest commodity price in the last 10 years. If the claim does not meet this test, the BLM can come in and invalidate the claim. The BLM has done this in the past and will likely do this more in the future as the anti-mining sentiment increases within the government and public.
After you find a deposit or an area you are interested in, you should get a topographical map of the area. From this map you can get the Township, Range and Section (and quarter section). Go to the BLM LR200 Website (a public database). See the address below.
Here, you type in the information (state, survey meridian and township/range info), and it will give you a list of all active mining claims in the section, also telling you which quarter section it is in. Look for the area you are interested in, or any areas that appear to be open. If there are any claims listed in the quarter section where you have an interest, write down the claim name and claim ID number. Call the BLM, and ask for a Notice of Location and Location Map for each claim. This will allow you to see exactly where the claim is located, along with the contact information of the owners of any adjoining claims.
Once you have found a section of open ground, call the BLM and get a Master Title Plat for the area of interest. This is a map that shows private property, patented mining claims, mineral withdrawals, and any Right of ways. On one occasion I forgot to do this step, and when I went to file the claim, I found that the mineral rights in the area I was interested in had been withdrawn.
After doing all this, if it still appears to be open and unclaimed, you can go ahead and claim it. This is done by putting up a copy of the Notice of Location (make sure you sign it) on the discovery post, then post all 4 corners. The Discovery can be on a corner. A GPS is the best way to post the corners, but is not required—although accuracy is important. This can be done with a stone cairn, or a wooden post (4×4 is preferred, though many states allow a 2×2—and PVC pipe is also often used, though discouraged).
At this point, you need to take the ORIGINAL Notice of Location (NOL)—signed—and send it to the Office of the Recorder of the county in which the claim is filed. The time limit for this varies by state—in Utah it is 30 days, while Idaho is 90 days from the date of location.
When you get it back from the county (with the county stamp), you must then send it to the BLM within 90 days from the date of location. I generally wait most of the 90 days before I send in the fees and NOL to the BLM so that I can check and see if someone else has filed a claim on the same land (It is hard to get your money back if you get beat out).
The fees to file the claim include: County recording fees (variable, generally $10-20 per claim); BLM Claim fees of $189 (including the first years assessment—$140, a $34 location fee, and a $15 registration fee).
After this, it generally takes $140 for the annual assessment and $10 per claim to keep the claim every year. The $140 annual assessment fee can be waived if you qualify for a small miner’s exemption (meaning you have 10 or fewer claims and are not registered as a corporation). To get the fee waived, you must file a Maintenance Fee Waiver Certification for each claim, each year before September 1st. To hold on to the claims you must also file an annual Affidavit of Assessment before December 30th.
As always, check with your local BLM office for of
Annual Fee Changes to Association Placer Claims to be announced by the BLM
May 22, 2012
The BLM is looking to change the way it collects fees on Association placer claims. An association claim is a placer claim that allows multiple claimants to work together under one claim—and file 20 acres for each locator listed on the claim These claims can have up to 8 people and 160 acres.
According to the BLM, Association Claims will be charged an annual assessment fee equal to the number claims you would have if they were filed 20 acres claim at a time, rather than as one block; and that this change is due to come out sometime later this year. The holders of a 160 acre placer claim currently pay $140 annually in assessment fees. After the change goes through, the claim holders will pay $140 for each of the 20 acre claim blocks included within it (for a total fee of $1120 per year). This is a big change.
As it currently stands, the Small Miners Exemption is still in effect, so any non-corporate entity with 10 or fewer claims during the year will still be able to do assessment work in instead of paying the fees. This will, however, cause a lot of problems for small to mid size miners that are looking to develop a claim block.
According to the BLM representative that I spoke with, this is already “approved” and will be implemented. Apparently it is not (and has not been) open for public comment.
If this change affects you, you should contact the BLM (and possibly a mining attorney) to see what your options will be. It would also be a good idea to contact your local Congressman, as they probably have no idea of the changes about to take effect.
Miners should also be aware that the current administration (Obama Administration) is looking to undermine (or eliminate) the Mining Laws of 1872, and replace them with a lease/fee permit system instead.
Here, I demonstrate how to set up a sluice. I am using a Gold Savers Sluice from the Roaring Camp Mining Company. I am working on a claim owned by the St. George Prospecting Club.
One Step at a Time . . .©
By Alan Chenworth
During the last year, we have been treated to a fantastic show about a group of people who opened a gold mine in Alaska. As near as I can tell, it is a show where a bunch of unemployed, arrogant know-nothings try to open a gold mine and make a living. I call the show fantastic—not because it is that good of a show—but because it is a fantastic example of most of the common mistakes (though exaggerated) that prospectors make. As I write this article, please bear in mind that I do not have TV, and did not watch the entire show. I did, however, get regular updates from people at work who did watch it. I also have the internet and watched the short clips of the show that were posted on Hulu (I think that they were enough for me to see that I didn’t need to watch the show).
Here is some of what I learned:
1: Be honest with yourself.
I watched a group of greenhorns head up to Alaska to open a gold mine. None of them knew anything about mining, geology or even Alaska. They didn’t know how to pan, what to look for or where to look. Most of them didn’t even know how to run or repair the equipment that was to be their livelihood. And none of them were willing to admit to themselves or the camera that they were in way over their heads and should not be going to Alaska. I guess that they thought they had nothing to lose. How wrong could they be?
When you start down the road to gold mining, you have to start at the beginning—just like you do with everything else. A baby needs to learn to crawl before he walks; and walk before he runs. The same is true with mining. Maybe you should spend some time in a creek with a gold pan before investing large sums of money into large mining equipment.
As Clint Eastwood was quoted as saying, “A man’s got to know his limitations.” Before getting involved with any large mining operation, you should take inventory of yourself. Know your limitations—they are great starting points as you continue to learn and grow. For example, if you have never run a dredge, taking over a lease off the coast of Nome, Alaska may not be a great idea, no matter how good the gold. Instead, it may be better to purchase a small dredge and practice on the local creeks for a few years. This would give you a chance to understand how to work the dredge, do small repairs, work underwater, prepare for cold-water work and process the concentrates.
This was just like the miners in the Alaska show . . . They took on too much too soon, and they got spanked.
2: Listen to those who know. (Keep in mind that I did not watch much of the show.)
The poor greenhorns listened to the experts long enough to be convinced that there was gold in the area. The guy on the other side of the creek was making bank on his claim, and assays seemed to support that the gold was there. However, when it came time to actually mine, they ignored the advice of the seasoned miners and did things their own way (and no, it didn’t work out too well).
As with anything else, it is a pretty good bet that the guys who have been doing this for a while probably know what they are doing—even if you don’t understand why. Listen to what they have to say. ASK QUESTIONS. Be patient. Try out what you have been told—put it to the test—then ask more questions. Learning is a process. It took the guys on the Alaska show most of the working season to finally get back to doing what they were told at the start of their operations.
3. Get some experience.
As I have already mentioned, these guys didn’t know anything about mining before buying a mine. While it may make a good TV show, it is probably not a good approach to life. The fact of the matter is that these guys would have believed anything they were told if the person they were listening to was holding a large gold nugget—Even if there was no gold on the claim.
I remember seeing one clip where the old guy pans down some material and shows the others some gold. He tells them something to the effect of “We are getting close—look there is about $20 dollars worth of gold in the pan.” Well, yes, there was gold in the pan. Was it $20? I don’t think so. Maybe it was a bad camera angle, or my eye sight is bad, or I didn’t see all of it, but it looked like two or three dollars to me. None of the other miners knew enough about it to tell him he was wrong. They didn’t know what to expect or how to value the gold. They weren’t ready to be mining commercially.
All placer miners need to develop a set of skills that include all of the common mining tasks such as: learning how to pan, run a sluice, clean the concentrates, and work with amalgam. It would also be a good idea to learn how to use common mining equipment, including (but not limited to highbankers, trommels , pumps, backhoes, bulldozers, and other earth-moving equipment) before taking on a major mining venture (or even a minor one). Learn the basics before trying to do the big complex tasks required in mining.
4. Do your homework.
What is the local geology? How deep is the gold? Is it all on bedrock, or is there a pay-layer or pay-streak? How is it identified? Could there be a chance that the claim on the other side of river has different geology than you do? (Just because he is getting good gold does not mean you will). Is the gold fine or coarse? How pure is it? (a 0.920 fine gold 50 % more gold than a 0.610 fine gold). If you don’t do your homework, you can’t properly evaluate the property.
We also need to look at equipment. They needed heavy equipment in order to work the claim—and bought it used. In my book, they overpaid, but probably didn’t know that because they didn’t do their homework. The equipment was in bad shape as well, causing them no end of problems.
Mining is a very capital-intensive venture, and you cannot just look at the amount of gold that has been estimated to be contained in the deposit as the amount of money that you will make. Fuel will eat into that amount very quickly (even more so in remote Alaska). Machinery, spare parts, repairs, hoses and oil are all expensive. Down time costs even more—as we saw in the show when they ran into winter weather that shut them down. What about food, shelter, and medical costs? You have to have them. Did they run the numbers that they needed to? I don’t think so. They didn’t even pay for the cost of the claim, let alone their time or equipment. Do your homework—this will take time—and hire a professional if needed. A good professional will be worth the fees you pay.
The guys on the show really needed to do some homework before going to Alaska.
5. Too many Partners are bad.
This one is going to be short and sweet. You want as few partners as possible. Too many people mean small profits. Everybody gets a share, so the share gets smaller for every person added to the payroll.
Too many partners also means too many people wanting to do things in different ways. The more partners you have, the harder it is to come to a consensus on where to work, how to work and when to work. People will also tend to pick favorites, make buddies, and team up/gang up on others. Eventually someone will be outcast. Not good.
The last reason too many partners are bad is that not all people work with the same intensity. I have watched gold splits be done on common operations where one guy donates the equipment and gas, then spends 12 hours digging or dredging while someone else works two hours, has a beer, takes a hike and talks our ears off, all while expecting an equal cut of the gold, mostly just because he was there.
I saw problems on the Alaska show that were likely caused by both too many partners and by picking the wrong partners.
6. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
In the Alaska show, I watched people quit jobs, sell houses, and move across the country to a strange and unfamiliar land to do something that sounded fun—but which they knew nothing about. This was probably not the smartest thing these people have ever done.
Before I sell my house to pay for a claim and some worn out mining equipment, I will have worked the claim, already had it paying well, and determined that I had enough ore in reserve to make up the money that I have invested, replace the house and provide for my family in the future.
If you wouldn’t sell everything you had to buy a factory that moulds cheese into small flower shapes or left handed forks, you probably shouldn’t sell everything to buy an unproven gold mine in a state where you have never been and equipment you don’t know how to operate. Mining is a business and should be approached as one—with care, planning, experience and patience.
Go slowly—Investing and building things up as you can—while building your base of knowledge.
7. GOLD FEVER is REAL!
This is probably the most important of the points. Gold fever is real. Never, EVER, forget that. People change when they see gold. Some people can handle it, but many can’t. People will lie, cheat and steal to get it. It can ruin a good friendship, push partners apart, destroy businesses and get in between families. People will kill to get it. Even among the honest, it breeds paranoia as they begin to think you are taking their gold.
Pick partners that you can trust—preferably people you have worked with in the past. The only way to know you can trust them is to already have a history with them. When two people work together, each trying to make sure that the other gets the bigger half—when each are working to make sure the other feels he is being treated fairly—then it has a chance to work out. Problems will always arise, but when you both approach the problem with respect and understanding of the other, things will usually work out.
The problems that I saw in the Alaska show were not new ones that I had never seen before—I have seen examples of this in my own life.
Several years ago, I met a young man that had recently been smitten by the gold bug. I met him at a small, local club meeting, and we chatted about mining for a short time. He had been panning for a few months and really liked it. And he had found a little gold (I think it was less than a gram) on some club claims. A few weeks later, I got a call from him wanting advice on mining equipment. He had a chance to buy a used trommel for something like $6000. He was self-employed, and while not rich, money was not an object. Should he buy it? Had I used one like it? Could he use it on my claims (he would give me a cut, of course).
I tried hard to slow him down. I told him to buy a sluice and work it for a while. To put some time into learning techniques—proper sluice set up, how to pan better, where to look for gold, how to clean up the concentrates. Maybe then he would be ready to buy a high-banker or small dredge—or maybe a metal detector. This would also give him a chance to explore new areas, learn to set up and use new equipment, and maybe find a deposit worth working. It would also give him a chance to see if this was really something that he wanted to pursue, and to see if he could make any money at it. Most small miners and prospectors don’t find enough gold to pay for their gas, let alone the equipment. Generally speaking, the smaller the mining operation is in terms of equipment and overhead, the better. You want to run as much material as you can through as little equipment as possible. As your overhead gets smaller, you will need to generate correspondingly less revenue to be successful.
When I hung up, he was still determined to buy the equipment. I don’t know what happened after that—I never saw him again. I hope things worked out, that he found a pile of gold, but I suspect that the trommel never paid for itself.
I am sure the show was truly fun to watch for millions of Americans. It has given them a sense of hope, a taste of adventure, with enough of a struggle to make it fulfilling in the end. It also gave prospectors both a good laugh and glimpse into the myriad of mistakes that are possible when we lose touch with reality. I hope it becomes a good tool to teach us all to be better prospectors and better people.
Here is a short video that shows the Crescent Creek Public Panning area in Henry Mountains of Southern Utah. It is a neat area. The gold can be good at times, though it is a bit spotty.
Is there Gold on Navajo Mountain?
By Alan Chenworth
For years I have been hearing rumors of gold found on or around Navajo Mountain. I had pretty much written them off as unfounded rumors due to the fact that I have never seen any fold from Navajo mountain, never talked to anyone that has personally found any; coupled with the fact that it is considered to be “sacred” land and the Indians don’t want any prospectors going up there. That being said, there is a documented history of mining in the area. In fact, an old Indian named “Hashkeniinii” was rumored to have a rich silver mine on the mountain; and several years later, there were four prospectors killed on Navajo Mountain, as they were searching for the silver mine.
In the late 1940′s, there was also a uranium boom on Navajo Mountain, when Luke Yazzie, a local Navajo, brought rich uranium ore into a trading post in Monument Valley. A large mining company came in and put a mine in on the ledge where Luke got his ore, making the tribe a lot of money while though Luke got nothing but a free lunch.
Navajo mountain sits just to the north of the Arizona-Utah state line in south central Utah—in the heart of Navajo Country—and was originally called Sierra Panoche. It is a tall, isolated dome that reaches up to 10,416 feet in elevation, and is formed by a mushroom shaped volcanic intrusion called a laccolith. It is an important source of water for the region, a source for game, and contains the only stand of limber pine in Navajo country.
Apparently Navajos regard it as sacred because Navajo Mountain is the the “head” of a Navajo maiden, whose “body” is formed by four regional mountains. (This is similar to the Ute legend of the Maiden whose body can be seen in the Timpanogos Mountain above Provo UT).
Navajo mountain is located completely on Navajo land, and the Navajos offer permits for hiking and camping—but apparently getting one can be a hit or miss proposition, depending on who you talk to, or what mood they are in. One thing that I do know is that mining and prospecting will not be considered. (That is one of the reasons I have not looked too hard into the rumors of gold around Navajo Mountain).
I have lately been researching the Abajo Mountains, and Blanding Mesa, and came across a a paper called Potential for Alkaline Igneous Rock-Related Gold Deposits in the Colorado Plateau by Felix Mutschler, Edwain Larsen and Micheal Ross. In this paper, they discussed the composition of the laccoliths in southern Utah and correlated the intrusions with gold mineralization. Gold occurrences are found in the Henry Mountains, in the La Sal Mountains, and in the Blues (or Abajo mountains). These three mountains are also closely related in many other ways: spatially-they are all relatively close together geographically; they are structurally similar—all three of these intrusions being laccoliths; age—the laccoliths all have similar ages of emplacement, with the dates of the intrusion being set at between 23 and 32 million years ago; and they are chemically similar—with a similar composition of both rock type and mineralogy—they are all diorite porphyries, and all have gold (or copper gold) mineralization. These three are also closely related to 3 more laccoliths in western Colorado that are also mineralized with copper, gold or silver. Navajo Mountain was included smack dab in the middle of the list of diorite porphyry laccoliths is Navajo Mountain, and it shares all the same characteristics as the other laccoliths in the region.
Here is a good photo of several pieces of river worn diorite porphyry, and it is often associated with gold. This photo was taken in Cottonwood Wash with gravel from the Blanding Mesa. The original source of the diorite porphyry is the Abajo laccolith.
If all of the other diorite porphyry laccoliths are minereralized—most containing gold—then there is a very good chance of finding gold on Navajo Mountain. It is possible that there are small placers in the areas drainage’s. More importantly, as the paper pointed out, there may be larger, low sulfide, sediment hosted micron gold deposits similar to the Carlin style deposits in the surrounding area. Its is worth noting that the low-sulfide micron deposits are a possibility not just at Navajo mountain, but would make good exploration targets for the La Sal mountains, the Henry mountains and the Blue mountains as well.
Even though mining an prospecting are off-limits, Navajo mountain would be a great place to explore. There are several 14 mile trails that take you out to Rainbow Bridge—the worlds largest, free standing natural rock arch, as well as miles of forest and high desert. Take a camera.
Potential for Alkaline Igneous Rock-Related Gold Deposits in the Colorado Plateau Laccolithic Centers, Felix Mutschler, Edwain Larsen and Micheal Ross, p. 232-252, Laccolithic Complexes of South Eastern Utah: Time Emplacement and Tectonics Setting—Workshop Proceedings, US Geological Survey Bulletin 2185, 1997.